Mon 23 Jan 2006
This quote from today’s NYT’s hinges around the word however neatly bridging the reasonable statement, and reasonable quotation from the Constitution. The by line was “By DAVID E. SANGER and JOHN O’NEIL.”
General Hayden defended the program’s constitutionality. He said the lower, “reasonable belief” standard conformed to the wording of the Fourth Amendment, asserting that it does not mention probable cause, but instead forbids “unreasonable” searches and seizures.
“The constitutional standard is reasonable,” he said. “I am convinced that we are lawful, because what it is we’re doing is reasonable,” he said.
The Fourth Amendment, however, reads: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
One Response to “ex-NSA chief interprets Constitution”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
January 23rd, 2006 at 9:53 pm
Nice catch! That is the most eloquent “however”!