Thu 21 Jul 2005
At this year’s Central Pennsylvania Festival of the Arts , I bought three beautiful photographs by Andrew Sovjani. I admired his work at last year’s Festival, and am delighted to have been able to bring some home this year. This got me thinking about a question on which I’m interested in hearing your thoughts: How do you decide what art (if any) to invite into your home? I know that I personally enjoy quite a wide variety of art, but there is relatively little of it that I actually want to own. Much art is beautiful, and much is intellectually interesting, but if I bought everything that I find attractive or thought-provoking, I would end up with a large and disjointed collection. So, what is it that makes a work cross the line between a casual flirt and a real committment?
In the case of Sovjani’s photographs, the deciding factor was undoubtedly mood. The word that springs to mind to describe these photographs is “quiet.” Each of his photos conveys a sense of perfect stillness. To me, the artist’s love of form really shines through these images, taking a single object that is itself simple and beautiful, and showing it off to advantage. Sovjani’s eye for balance and form really epitomizes, for me, why simplicity is elegant.
So for me, I think the answer to the question of what makes the difference between admiration and purchase is the philosophy embodied in the artwork. I like my environment to reflect my philosophy and to induce the kind of mood that I like to be in. In this case, the simplicity and tranquility of Sovjani’s photographs is a very welcome addition to my home.
Interestingly, I spoke with Sovjani at the festival, and he told me he always lives with an image for at least a year before deciding to exhibit or sell it, which I thought was a neat commentary on how art “works.”
In case you are curious, the three photos that I bought are “Study in Whites,” “Ten Tulips,” and “Coral Charm.” The one that I really wanted was under the “Uniquely Ordinary” gallery and is called “Steps,” but that photo is one that looks much less impressive on a smaller scale than it does in a large size, and I couldn’t afford the large one, so I decided to hold out. I am also extremely fond of “Paper White” in that same gallery.
I’m very interested in hearing your thoughts on art and how you choose (or don’t choose) it.
2 Responses to “Andrew Sovjani Photography”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
July 21st, 2005 at 11:55 pm
I don’t have a lot of experience in buying art to hang on the wall — like jewelry and other personal adornments, it just doesn’t occur too me to spend money on these things unless I’m directly reminded or encouraged. :) However, since buying my house, I’ve found that I’m more interested in finding just the right things to go in it. I’d say that my current art selection heuristic is strongly influenced by the question, “Would this look good in my house?” where “good” means “harmonious, matching the other items in the room/house.” My house is so cottage-y and garden-y that I find myself very drawn towards natural-themed and colored items, even though in general my own “taste” in art is for things that make me stop and study, and think about them (like Escher’s work).
To be a little more concrete, I am very proud of this recent purchase:
which I, too, found at a local arts festival (Moab, UT, in this case). The leafy theme goes very well with my house (currently decorated in greens, reds, creams, and browns), and I find the color sweep and shape symmetry very attractive. I have other bits of art that have leaf/nature themes.
My other favorite piece of art is “Dance Me to the End of Love” (cheesy, silly name!) by Jack Vettriano. I have other favorites by the same artist — he never shows his subjects’ faces, but they are clean, elegant portrayals of beautiful dancers.
July 21st, 2005 at 11:56 pm
Argh. I guess my clever in-line image links didn’t work here, and I can’t edit my comment. Here are the links:
Circular Maple Spectrum with Seeds
Dance Me to the End of Love